Editorial: Liberation

• The discussion in the National Assembly about the end-of-life law is crucial and needed.
• The debate should be serious, and kept away from the political clash and controversy.
• Political fractures are relevant, but should not dominate the debate.
• Personal emotions can challenge political convictions; they should be respected.
• It is necessary to listen all voices, including those opposed to the new law.

Conclusion: Doubting and showing fragility in the face of death can be acceptable. This might convince those who have not yet decided to advance with the law.

---