Post-World War II UK, once at the forefront in defining international norms for human rights, is facing a major regression with the passing of the 'Rwanda Safety Act'.
This legislation declares Rwanda a 'safe country' for asylum seekers, contradicting a previous decision by the UK's Supreme Court.
It plans for the deportation of illegal migrants to the aforementioned African country rather than allowing them to seek protection in London.
The text of this law aims to discourage immigration and avoids appeals against deportations.
The issue of immigration has been cynically politically instrumentalized, centered since the Brexit vote in 2016.
The British Prime Minister is unlikely to prevent the predicted electoral failure, being associated with a costly, ineffective and counterproductive measure to human rights.
The law might end up as a fiasco similar to Brexit, while deportations to Rwanda will not dissuade migrants seeking a better life.
Conclusion: This backslide poses a significant challenge for European democracies and their professed values, pointing out the necessity of cooperative and international management of migration rather than a unilateral and punitive approach. The issue of human rights needs to be central to the debate.