A state can now be held accountable for failing to protect its citizens from the consequences of climate change.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) solidified this through a pioneering decision that may set a precedent for the forty-six member states of the Council of Europe.
The ECHR ruled on a complaint lodged by women accusing Swiss authorities of inadequate climate policies to protect their health.
The ECHR’s judgement is a critical advancement in the fight against climate change, explicitly associating climate change with quality of life, health, and wellbeing.
Fighting greenhouse gases is no longer an option but an obligation for governments.
The decision of the ECHR now obligates the Council's forty-six member states to execute ambitious public climate policies.
Conclusion: Despite the lack of sanctions for non-compliance, the ECHR's decision exposes the hypocrisy and cynicism that allows states to breach their commitments. Holding them accountable to their citizens represents a constructive progress in the fight against global warming.