Editorial: La Vanguardia

• The Supreme Court of Israel has invalidated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's judicial reform.
• The decision was adopted in a polarized context, with eight judges voting in favor of the annulment and seven against.
• Netanyahu's initiatives were criticized for their apparent attempts to weaken and subdue the judiciary.
• The verdict of the Supreme Court reinforces the democratic condition of Israel in the Middle East.
• October 7 was a setback for Netanyahu due to errors in national security.
• Netanyahu's statements about the duration of the war contrast with Washington's requests, raising doubts about the political intention behind the pronouncement.
• Public opinion and the army have the influence to ensure the war does not last longer than strictly necessary.

Conclusion: The ruling of the Supreme Court of Israel, invalidating the judicial reform promoted by Netanyahu, represents a major setback for the conservative leader, placing him at a critical point in his political career, especially in the context of the conflict in Gaza.

---