The latest move by the Public Prosecutor's Office introduces a distinction between criminal and political responsibility.
It is stated that the investigated facts do not constitute a crime, but they might not be ethical or desirable in a democratic state.
The case focuses on the use of a position to foster a professional activity and whether it aligns with public exemplarity standards.
The Public Prosecutor's Office raises ethical issues and recognizes that mixing private interests with institutional ones is undesirable.
The Government has tried to discredit the judiciary and evade the debate.
Conclusion: Democracy requires exemplarity beyond legality and there needs to be a serious discussion about the favoritism that comes from proximity to power.