The complicity of Atletico Madrid with its radicals is incompatible with sport and coexistence.
The image of Simeone and players Koke and Giménez negotiating with the radicals and applauding them at the end of the match is concerning.
Accepting radicals as interlocutors shows an inappropriate tolerance for violence.
Only a strong reaction from the management of Atletico, with Miguel Ángel Gil Marín at the helm, could end the radical stand.
Maintaining complicity with radicals means institutionalizing intolerance, which is dangerous and unacceptable.
Conclusion: Football cannot be a refuge for the violent. It is necessary for Atletico Madrid to take strong measures against violence in their stands and stop tolerating the radicals.