The agreement between PSOE and PP to renew the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) has stalled due to disagreement over the election of the president.
The CGPJ council members have the responsibility of electing a candidate that can safeguard the independence of the judiciary.
The insistence of a section of council members on the president being obligatorily female has created disagreement.
It is essential that, despite being nominated by political parties, the council members show complete independence.
Two candidates have been proposed for the presidency: Pilar Teso, proposed by the progressive bloc, and Pablo Lucas, by the conservative one.
Conclusion: It is imperative that the CGPJ, despite the political origin of its members, demonstrates total independence and selects a president who can guard the independence of the judiciary.