Editorial: El País

• The U.S. Supreme Court has granted 'absolute immunity' to presidents for acts carried out in the exercise of their main constitutional functions.
• Three of the conservative judges who supported the measure were appointed by Donald Trump.
• The high court argues that immunity is necessary to preserve the independence of the Executive Branch.
• The ruling has been criticized by three progressive judges who have warned of the 'nightmare scenarios' that can arise as a result.
• The court's ruling has benefited Trump, even in pending cases that date back to before his presidency.
• This measure may change the nature of the presidency, turning the nation's leader into 'a king above the law'.

Conclusion: The Supreme Court's decision is controversial and may have long-term implications for the role and responsibility of the U.S. president.

---