Editorial: El País

• The Supreme Court filed the Tsunami case against Carles Puigdemont and Ruben Wagensberg.
• The National Court concluded that the investigation had been extended out of term.
• García-Castellón's actions seemed to respond to different stages of Pedro Sánchez's appointment and the amnesty law.
• Puigdemont was included in the case without relevant evidence.
• The Supreme Court tried to categorize protests against the procés sentence as terrorist crimes.
• A formal error ended the investigation which did not result in relevant findings.

Conclusion: The Tsunami case shows that not everything goes against amnesty and that the rule of law has prevailed.

---